President Obamas påtryckningar på den irakiska regeringen för att amerikanska trupper ska få stanna i landet och behålla sina baser när tidsfristen för de sista trupper att lämna landet i slutet av december i år löper ut, har blivit allt intensivare.
Bl.a. har Obama-regeringen nu lovat att sälja stridsflygplan till den irakiska regeringen:som Wall Sytreet Journals Adam Eentous och Ben Lando i Baghdad och Nathan Hodge i Washington skriver:
The complex intersection of U.S., Iraqi and Iranian interests has led the U.S. to bet that a strong Iraq will serve regional stability and keep Tehran’s ambitions at bay. Mr. al-Maliki and his Shiite-dominated government have cordial relations with the theocratic Shiite regime in Tehran, even though the two nations fought bitterly during the 1980s.
Officials said lawmakers would likely support an expanded package for Iraq, but they expect tough questions to be asked first. U.S. weapons meant for fragile allies have ended up in unfriendly hands in the past, as with Iran in the wake of the 1979 Islamic revolution.
Tim Arango skriver i New York Times om att de båda regeringarna har ett hemlig överenskommelse om att amerikanska trupper kan stanna och att de därför kommer att få behålla sina baser i landet: In Shadow of Death, Iraq and U.S. Tiptoe Around a Deadline – NYTimes.com
BAGHDAD — The government of Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki is privately telling American officials that it wants their army to stay here after this year. The Americans are privately telling their Iraqi counterparts that they want to stay. But under what conditions, and at what price to the Americans who stay behind? American combat deaths are on the rise here, an ominous harbinger of what lies ahead if an agreement is reached to keep troops here after the withdrawal deadline set for the end of the year. For the same Iraqi government that wants the Americans to stay is also tacitly condoning attacks by Shiite militias on American troops, by failing to respond as aggressively to their attacks as it does to those of Sunni insurgent groups such as Al Qaeda in Iraq.
Samtidigt skriver New York Times Michael S Schmidt om den försämrade säkerhetssituationen i Irak:U.S. Report Finds Security Deteriorating in Iraq
Over the past year, security in Iraq has deteriorated and electricity shortages and corruption have continued unabated, according to a report released Saturday by a special inspector appointed by Congress to oversee Iraq’s reconstruction.
The report, released five months before the United States is scheduled to withdraw 47,000 troops from Iraq, paints a bleaker picture of the country’s stability than assessments by diplomatic officials.
Det här är djupt tragiskt och visar hur USA under Obama har svängt in bakom George Bushs neokonservativa utrikespolitik med fasta baser i Irak och ytterligare tre års krig i Afghanistan. Och när den tidsfristen löper ut, kommer USA att respektera den mer än Obama respekterade tidsfristen i Irak?
Det tragiska är att när Sovjet och Kinatrogna kommunister på sin tid försökte utmåla USA som en imperialistisk makt så var det en ren och skär lögn, det var Sovjet och Kina som stod för imperialismen. Kina gör det fortfarande i Mongoliet, Tibet och Turkestan.
Men under Bush och hans lärjunge Obama har USA tyvärr förändrats till något som allt mer liknar nidbilden från 1960- och 1970-talen.
Istället för att stödja Jaminrevolutionen i Mellanöstern och arbeta för ett fritt Palestina verkar Obama helt tondöv för en av världshistoriens stora demokratirevolutioner och föredrar att fortsätta med George Bushs “Krig mot Terrorismen”.
När demokratirörelsen i Syrien störtar Assad-regimen, som de flesta nu tror är oundvikligt, så är det svårt att se hur mullorna i Iran kommer att kunna överleva speciellt länge.
Vilka skäl kommer Obama då att ge för de amerikanska baserna i Irak?
En helt ofattbar miss och krig som USA inte längre har råd med.
Axplock från den nordiska pressen:
Nyheter – Nyheter,Helsingborgs Dagblad: Nyheter, SvD – Utrikes, Politiken.dk Seneste nyt, Helsingborgs Dagblad: Nyheter, Politiken.dk Seneste nyt, Dagen.se – Stora nyheter, Dagen.se – Stora nyheter
Länkar:Centcom
[tags] Irak, USA i Irak, Amerikanska trupper i Irak,Obama Irak, Amerikanska stridsplan till Irak, USA stannar i Iral, Amerikanska baser i Irak[/tags]
Kan tro flytta berg så kan den nog även starta krig.
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/28/syrians-moving-chemical-weapons-for-security/
Syrians moving chemical weapons for security
The United States has intelligence that Syria has moved chemical weapons for security reasons, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said on Friday.
Panetta said that intelligence shows movement at some sites.
There has been “limited movement” at Syria’s major chemical storage sites, Panetta said in response to questions from CNN’s Barbara Starr.
But the United States believes that the stashes remain secured by the Syrian military.
Panetta added that the sites remain monitored by the United States and other countries.
“We’ve continued to monitor that. We are working with countries in the region to ensure that we have the best information possible with regards to the sites and how they are being secured,” Panetta said.
The United States has intelligence that Syria has moved chemical weapons at some sites for security reasons, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said on Friday.
There has been “limited movement” at Syria’s major chemical storage sites, Panetta said at the Pentagon in response to questions from CNN’s Barbara Starr.
But the United States believes the stashes remain secured by the Syrian military, adding that the sites are being monitored by the U.S. and other countries.
“We’ve continued to monitor that. We are working with countries in the region to ensure that we have the best information possible with regards to the sites and how they are being secured,” Panetta said.
Though Panetta said he was unsure of where these movements had occurred, he said the steps were taken “for the Syrians to better secure the chemicals.”
Concern first arose in July when satellite surveillance and communications intercepts revealed some initial stockpile movements.
In August, President Barack Obama warned the Syrian government about using chemical weapons, or even moving them.
“We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized. That would change my calculus. That would change my equation,” President Obama said.
A senior administration official explained on Friday that President Obama was not referring to weapons being moved for security reasons.
“The President was talking about proliferation of WMD or giving it to other bad actors,” the official said.
Panetta said he could not say whether Syrian rebels have gained access to any chemical weapons.
“With regards to the movement of this and whether or not they’ve been able to locate some of it, we just don’t know,” Panetta said.
The existence of chemical weapons in Syria and the danger they pose in the war-wracked country has heightened a sense of urgency among world powers working to end the civil war.
Here’s the transcript:
CNN’S BARBARA STARR: Mr. Secretary, I want to ask you about Syria’s
chemical weapons. You have spoken extensively about your broad
concern about it. I want to ask you with some specificity this
morning. Rebel groups are claiming that they have captured some
military sites in Iraq – in Syria – where, in fact, they have found
chemical weapons components, capability, whatever it may be, at some
of the areas they now control.
So do you now believe that rebels have essentially found – do
you have concerns that they have found some of Syria’s chemical
weapons capability?
Do you believe that Syria’s chemical weapons have been moved
beyond the initial incident of many, many weeks ago? And what
concerns does this now pose in the equation?
Does it raise a concern that Iranian Al Quds inside Syria could also be getting their hands on chemical capability there?
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE LEON PANETTA: First and foremost, as I’ve – as I’ve expressed,
obviously we – we continue to have a concern about the security of
the [chemical and biological weapons] sites, and we continue to monitor that. We’re working with –
with the countries in the region to ensure that – that we have the
best information possible with regards to the sites and how they’re
being secured.
At – at this stage, with regards to, you know, the major sites
that we’re looking at, we do believe that those sites still remain
secured by – by the Syrian military.
There has been intelligence that there have been some moves that
have taken place. Where exactly that’s taken place, we don’t know. I
don’t have any specific information about the opposition and whether
or not they’ve obtained some of this or how much they’ve obtained and
just exactly what’s taken place.
But with regards to, you know, the movement of the – of some of
this and whether or not they’ve been able to locate some of it, we
just don’t know.
The main point I would make, though, is that we still believe
that, based on what we know and what we’re monitoring, that the
principal sites that we are concerned about still remain secure.
STARR: I’m sorry, sir, can I just ask you to clarify? You
have for the first time, I think, are saying moves, multiple moves of
chemical weapons. We knew of one incident many, many weeks ago.
Can you elaborate? And you’re not talking about the main sites.
So are you seeing things move? Just tell (inaudible) what you mean.
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE LEON PANETTA: What – what we mean is that there has been some
intelligence that – that, with regards to some of these sites, that
there has been some movement in order to – for the Syrian to better
secure what they – the chemicals. And while there’s been some
limited movement, again, the major sites still remain in place, still
remain secure.
But as to, you know, the movement of some of these – these
materials and what, you know, whether or not they’ve been exposed to
– to possession by – by the opposition or others, that’s something
we – I – I really don’t have any firm information to confirm that
that’s taken place.
STARR: But if they’re still secure – that if – if you’re
saying they’re secure…
(CROSSTALK)
PANETTA: Well, main sites – the main sites, as we’ve determined
and monitored, still remain secure.
Är det inte dags för Obama att lämna tillbaka sitt Fredspris!?